Blogger Jebat said in his blog, what most people fail to realize is that
"The existence of this letter so far had only revealed to us that:
1) There are good officers with clear conscience in the MACC – the MACC is not an institution of pure evil
2) Teoh Beng Hock’s death could not be certain by this letter
The letter still could not determine how did Teoh Beng Hock die, when did he die, and why did he or other people want him to die."
The most important bit of the puzzle is still missing in the big picture.
Jebat added,
Anyway, the writers of the letter knew that Hishamuddin had gone back from the office that morning. They actually saw him going back home although he did not do the obligatory punch-out. It is quite peculiar for them to say that. Because, this immediately absolves Hishamuddin from ever been at the point of TBH’s death because according to experts, TBH time of death is from 8am to 9.30am.
Hmmm.. as we all know, one of the last person to see Teoh Beng Hock was Tan Boon Hwa and this was admitted by the latter who made the declaration that around 6am to 6.30am, he saw Teoh Beng Hock looking ‘tired and quiet’ in the pantry.
What do you think? Has the letter, purportedly written by a group of MACC officers, had somehow told us that Hishamuddin could be free of any accusation that he murdered Teoh Beng Hock? Many are using this letter to further strengthen their claims that MACC killed a member of the opposition.
Full article refer to Letter from good MACC officers accusing the bad MACC officer.
PART 2,
Many would probably thought the famous blogger Raja Petra Kamarudin is probably taking the same side as the Pakatan government but the truth is, he is neither with the Barisan nor Pakatan. He is with the truth instead of blindly following a politician party.
I still remember one of my friends asked me one day, do I support or against the government?
To me, it doesn't matter who they are as long as they are working for the rakyat. Politicians are all the same; they stay in power for too long and they start to get corrupted. It is an unwritten rule.
This is why I don't get it when so many out there are worshiping Anwar. He might be an icon down the history but he stays just there, nothing more.
Chinese has a popular saying; it doesn't matter if a cat is white or black as long as it catches mice. So, the question is, why are we picking the cat instead of someone who is capable of getting those job done?
RPK has an interesting analogy,
"Prostitutes are better creatures than politicians. With prostitutes, you pay them money and you get to screw them. With politicians, you pay them money and they screw you. Prostitutes promise you a good time and deliver. Politicians never deliver on their promises."
I salute PRK for his insight.
"It is time we took back the country from the politicians. Politicians, both sides of the political divide, are just not delivering. They are screwing us good and proper. Politicians just can’t be trusted. If Barisan Nasional kicks Pakatan Rakyat out come next general election it is not because Barisan is strong, it is because Pakatan is weak."
Remember, it is not the cat but the one capable of getting the job done is always my pick at the end of the day.
Two party systems is a good thing to begin with because it is a healthy system. It ensures both parties would watch their steps closely and therefore, they wouldn't dare to think of personal benefit.
One of my teachers believes that politician is a fast and easy way to get rich in Malaysia.
Read last few paragraphs of Saya Anak Bangsa Malaysia written by RPK.
Posts
